March 20th, 2008
Barack Has The Best Chance To Beat McCain in November
I have posted plenty about the democratic primary lately. Electing a black President could represent the biggest gain for black business people in many years. This could be bigger than Affirmative Action. Hillary’s case with the super delegates is she is the best choice for November. Her implication is the big states she has won provide her with momentum in the states the democrats have to win in order to regain the White House. The Electoral College has been fairly consistent in terms of how states vote in Presidential elections since 1964. It is logical to evaluate the most recent Democratic Presidential election win in the popular vote to establish trends.
This Study is done by Jesse Jackson Jr., National Co-Chairman of the Obama campaign and Congressman for Illinois 2nd Congressional District. His enlighten analysis offers compelling evidence that Obama offers the Democratic Party it’s best chance for victory in November. Please see below.
Clinton’s “Big State” Theory
Obama Campaigns for All Americans, Not Just Some
By Rep. Jesse Jackson, Jr.
In the 2000 election, the one that created the red/blue map, Vice-President Al Gore was officially credited with winning 20 states plus Washington, D.C. Had he captured the electoral votes of even one more state, even one as small as New Hampshire, he would have been sworn in as President instead of George W. Bush.
So it make sense to look at who is winning the “Gore” states, the “blue” states, the states that Democrats carried in 2000, rather than focusing on some new argument about “big” states?
After all, one of the biggest states is Texas, Bush’s home base, which Gore never tried to carry. The point is, one key to winning is your ability to carry “blue” states first (plus at least one more!).
Barack Obama has won more “Gore” states so far, by a 2-1 margin.
Obama has won 12 Gore states:
Maine Vermont
Connecticut
Delaware Maryland
Hawaii
Illinois Wisconsin
Washington, D.C.
Iowa Minnesota
Washington
Clinton has won 6 Gore states:
New York Rhode Island
Massachusetts
New Jersey California
New Mexico
There are still 3 Gore states to go (plus we could mention Florida, which Gore really won!):
Michigan Pennsylvania
Oregon
Isn’t it at least possible that the ability to carry these “Gore” states is more important than the ability to carry “big”
states?
Let me make one more point related to this whole Clinton argument about the “big” states—as Bill Clinton himself proved in his 1992 victory, the ability to win a Democratic primary or caucus is not directly correlated to your ability to carry that same state in November.
Guess how many states Bill Clinton won in the fall that he had lost in the Democratic primary and caucus process? I counted 13.
Of the 33 states he carried to win the Presidency, Clinton lost
2 states to Tom Harkin—Iowa Minnesota. He lost 5 states to Jerry Brown—Nevada, Colorado, Maine, Connecticut Vermont. And he lost 6 more states to Paul Tsongas—Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Maryland, Rhode Island, Delaware and Washington.
The conclusion is obvious—losing a state in the primary/caucus process to a Democratic opponent does not mean that you cannot win that state in the fall against a Republican opponent. Bill Clinton disproved that theory in 1992—13 times.
Both of the points I made above—that Obama is winning the Gore states, and that losing a state in the Democratic primaries does not prevent you from winning it in the fall against the Republicans—cast further doubt on the Clinton campaign’s newly-invented “big state” theory. It may well be true that the Clinton strategy for trying to win the Democratic nomination was based on a group of big states—but that strategy has not only fallen behind the Obama campaign strategy of treating all the states as important, it is not necessary to win in November.
Al Gore showed us that in 2000. And Bill Clinton showed us that in 1992.
(To confirm, contact Ken Edmonds at 202-445-1484. Feel Free to POST.)
————————————————————————-
Jesse Jackson, Jr. - Congressman Second District of Illinois http://www.jessejacksonjr.org
Join the campaign to build a more perfect union. Contribute online by
visiting: http://www.jessejacksonjr.org/contribute
Paid for and maintained by Jesse Jackson, Jr. for Congress
.






March 20th, 2008 at 3:06 pm
Take nothing for granted. It’s not over til it’s over.
March 20th, 2008 at 3:29 pm
This is the kind of information we need out there to refute Hillary’s fusillading and desperate arguments, in her attempt to gerryrig the election.
March 20th, 2008 at 5:35 pm
Yobachi, I agree because with out this type of data, Hillary’s spin makes sense
March 21st, 2008 at 5:26 am
I agree that this must be circulated. Thanks for this information. I’m going to post it also.
March 21st, 2008 at 2:29 pm
Cool Vanessa, it makes a logical rebuttal. Thanks for the comment
March 21st, 2008 at 2:42 pm
Eddie, thanks for the visit. We are seeing how difficult winning is, even when you are way ahead